The HackerOne report that does not even apply has 44 upvotes.
What do upvotes mean on HackerOne?
I guess, at least here, they’re mindless “looks interesting” or “looks well worded” or something?
«Lgtm»
merge
Those who use AI to report to open source projects and flood the volunteering devs who keep the World going, should be disqualified from using those open source projects to begin with (even though thats not feasible)
I still don’t get it, like, why tf would you use AI for this kind of thing? It can barely make a basic python script, let alone actually handle a proper codebase or detect a vulnerability, even if it is the most obvious vulnerability ever
It’s simple actually, curl has a bug bounty program where reporting even a minor legitimate vulnerability can land you at a minimum $540
What are the odds that you’re actually going to get a bounty out of it? Seems unlikely that an AI would hallucinate an actually correct bug.
Maybe the people doing this are much more optimistic about how useful LLMs are for this than I am but it’s possible that there’s some more malicious idea behind it.
The user who submitted the report that Stenberg considered the “last straw” seems to have a history of getting bounty payouts; I have no idea how many of those were AI-assisted, but it’s possible that by using an LLM to automate making reports, they’re making some money despite having a low success rate.
Maybe the people doing this are much more optimistic about how useful LLMs are for this than I am
Yes. That is the problem being reported in this article. There are many many people who have complete and unblemished optimism about how useful LLMs are, to the point where they don’t understand it’s optimism and don’t understand why other people won’t take them seriously.
Some of them are professionals in related fields
We have several scientific articles being published and later found to have been generated via AI.
If somebody is willing to ruin their academic reputation, something that takes years to build, don’t you think people are also using AI to cheat at a job interview and land a high paying IT job?
I have a dream that one day it will be possible to identify which AI said slop came from and so to charge the owners of said slop generator for releasing such a defective product uncontrolled on the world.
Ooh, embedded stenography!
Just use AI to remove all the AI slop!
But if we use AI to fight the AI, then what do we use to fight the AI we released to fight the AI‽
More AI 😈
Like turtles, it’s AI all the way down.
Cats. If you don’t believe me, ask Australians. Cats all the way.
Just rewrite curl in Rust so you can immediately close any AI slop reports talking about memory safety issues. /s