• SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You won’t ever get me to care about what init system I run on my machine. I just need it to work.

  • Safeguard@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree. For a init system.

    I don’t like the “takeover” of network and home folders. (It feels like a takeover for me)

  • ISO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The first thing forcing an option does, is depriving that option the ability to know what it could achieve on pure merit.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Systemd is fine but I am kinda sad that it’s ubiquity has resulted in increasing dependence on it.

    I really like void linux which uses runit and it seems like its getting harder for things to work without systemd. Gnome made some changes fairly recently that increase dependence, I hope devs can build ways for gnome to still work :/

    My only real criticism is that using runit makes me feel like systemd could be a lot smaller and more elegant. But using systemd has never caused me any problems as best I’m aware 🤷‍♂️

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No one cares about systemd at this point

    If you want to use your computer like it is 2005 go for it. Just don’t keep bringing up this dead topic.