tyler@programming.dev to Python@programming.dev · 6 days agoO(no) You Didn’tmrshiny608.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down10
arrow-up113arrow-down1external-linkO(no) You Didn’tmrshiny608.github.iotyler@programming.dev to Python@programming.dev · 6 days agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squareFizzyOrange@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 days agoTL;DR, big-O ignores the constant factor. If you already know what that means you don’t need to read this…
minus-squareduckythescientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 days agoEh, I also enjoyed seeing the comparison between Go and Python, seeing the jumps in time because of allocations, and knowing the size of the list when the more efficient algorithm started to become faster.
TL;DR, big-O ignores the constant factor. If you already know what that means you don’t need to read this…
Eh, I also enjoyed seeing the comparison between Go and Python, seeing the jumps in time because of allocations, and knowing the size of the list when the more efficient algorithm started to become faster.