I am trying to use my old laptops for self-hosting. One has a 6th gen Intel Core i3 (4GB ram), the other has an 11th gen Intel Core i5 (8GB ram). I have previously tried both ubuntu server and desktop but couldn’t get it to work well. For the former I found it difficult to remote ssh and the latter I had difficulty installing Docker containers. (I’m not very good with the command line)

I would like to find an OS that is easier to setup with less of a neccesity for the command line (I would still like to learn how to use it though, I don’t want to get rid of it entirely!). I’ve heard of CasaOS, is that a good option? It seems quite easy to use. What about other alternatives?

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you’re afraid of the terminal, you won’t get far in self hosting. You should learn to use the terminal. It’s not as scary as people make it sound.

    You mentioned having issues with SSH into your old server. You can install a desktop environment if it makes things easier for you, but you should still learn how to be proficient in the terminal. Proxmox might help. It lets you create and manage VMs through a web interface. It can be annoying if you’re not super familiar with networking though.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s not as scary as people make it sound.

      It is not “scary”. It is complicated and requires special knowlege.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I wouldn’t call it complicated, but yeah, it’s special knowledge. So is all of self hosting.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You wouldn’t. A lot of tech people wouldn’t. But it is. I’ve found this out the hard way, after spending dozens of hours trying to figure it out. You’re not doing anyone any favors.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It’s not any more complicated than a GUI, it’s just that the dozens of hours you spent learning to use a GUI was a long time ago, and you don’t remember how complicated it was.

            Also, you’re probably exaggerating, because dozens of hours is way longer than it should take to become proficient at the terminal. There are resources online that you can use to learn in a few hours.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              it’s just that the dozens of hours you spent learning to use a GUI

              This is utter nonsense. You do not need to learn to use a GUI. You just look at the available buttons and click the ones you need. And when you click them they do what they say, they don’t return a “command not found” or “undefined error” with zero diagnostic information. And they work the same regardless of what OS or distro you’re on.

              The fact that you don’t understand this is why you’re not qualified to tell people that it’s “easy”.

              • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                30 minutes ago

                Ok, so it’s been long enough for you, that you can’t even conceive of not knowing how to use a GUI anymore. Good for you, I guess.

      • aMockTie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Imagine if OP asked: “I want to repair/maintain my own car, but I don’t want to open the hood or get under the car. What are my options?”

        Obviously there would be some options, but those options would be very limited and not ideal. This is very similar. Self-hosting, like self-repair of a vehicle, requires some foundational knowledge and understanding of your specific hardware, usecase, and needs, as well as the knowledge and ability to bring those things to fruition. There is no single universal answer that applies to everyone, but those skills can be acquired by anyone.

        I don’t think self-hosting is any more doomed than self-repair of a vehicle. It’s certainly not for everyone, but it can be satisfying, rewarding, enjoyable, and generally optimized for those who choose to participate.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Notice that it hasn’t amongst mainstream consumers.

          You know what self hosted projects have been successes? Plex and Home Assistant. You know what projects don’t require the terminal? Plex and Home Assistant.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Notice that it hasn’t amongst mainstream consumers.

            Good. Mainstream consumers don’t understand enough about networking and computer security to be trusted to self-host anything beyond desktop applications. And even that is debatable. They’re so bad at it that walled-gardens have become ubiquitous just to keep viruses from running rampant.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Self hosting isn’t likely to ever get to the point of “plug and play”. It’s inherently incredibly flexible and different people will do different things with it. Some people just want NAS. Some people want to build a router. Some people want to have a modest compute farm that they physically own. Some people want a virtualization playground. Or pretty much anything else you can think of, or some combination thereof.

        For instance, I custom built a 2-tier + optane cached NAS running proxmox, and I have a handful of old thin clients I can spin up for doing Beowulf things when I feel like it, and I also have another repurposed thin client with an old enterprise-grade SFP+ NIC running pfSense as my router that can support up to 10g (futureproofing).

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. You really don’t want to self host unless you are pretty familiar with how these services work. Otherwise, you’re just setting yourself up to get hacked.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I mean what’s the point of “self” hosting then?

          If you have to be a professional server administrator to host one of these services, then why even have a self hosting community as opposed to just a hosting community for server admins to discuss how to set and configure various services? Is this community dedicated to just discussing the uniqueness of managing a home server without a static IP?

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you want to ride a bike, you need to learn to balance on a bike. That will never change. You don’t need to be a professional cyclist.

            If you want to self host, you need to learn some basic administration, and that includes the terminal. That will never change. You don’t need to be a professional server administrator.

            You might be able to get by with some hand holdy solution that offers a few things you can do, but just like riding a scooter is much more limited than riding a bike, using a turnkey solution is much more limited than setting up your own server.

            Imagine wanting to self host but refusing to learn how to forward a port. There are just some things you need to learn. Like I said in my original comment, the terminal is not as scary as people make it sound. Right now, you are the person making it sound scary.