• Holla@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      They figured out that since these planes were flying circles anyway they could just rely on that. The pilots actually prefer this because it has stabler aerodynamics during liftoff and landing.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    US sales pitch: “buy from me you stupid losers!” 🤪 😆 😂 🤣 😅

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    US Military defense contractors who unilaterally supported the trump candidacy: well, fuck.

  • Akh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly, until the grafting stops, not sure anyone should trust US weapons. The f35 got shot down on its first combat mission that was not against a ballon

    • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Stealth isn’t invisibility, much less invincibility.

      Your critique is a plane that isn’t invincible or invisible, was able to be hit by a short range anti-air munition that was able to see it, and therefore visually track it?

      Honestly, this just sounds like you read a lot of RT, or listen to people who do.