• pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Really?

      I thought it’s great, since those exploits didn’t just come from thin air. It would be bad if someone got their hands on a zero-day and managed to do something catastrophic, like shutting down airports, or blowing up a power plant.

      Also, it’s not like they’re losing money over this.

  • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    How many of these security news stories are largely exaggerated by Redmond and its affiliated outlets?

    • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s best to read the actual docs published by the research when available. News tells some, but I have seen it sensationalized a few times, where it only affects x kernel with y module before update z.

      That being said, these are seemingly getting more and more frequent as previously noted.

    • nyan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, you don’t even need Redmond in the equation, just normal media shenanigans. Doomsday warnings sell more newspapers ad impressions than “Minor security issue here, patch when available.”

  • mecen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    If it was backdoor that means someone created it maliciously or it is bug?

    • Gagootron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is a tool to establish persistente after the server is already hacked. This isn’t a way to break into a server.