• cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some are genuine and trustworthy, but finding them is a needle in a haystack and Youtube will rarely lead you directly to them (because of course, it’s not in their interest to do so). Others are at least transparent when they’re being marketing tools. The ones that try to hide it and pretend to be “organic” when they’re shilling trash are the worst.

        • nullroot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Aurora tech is untrustworthy? What about my tech fun? Functional print Friday? There are definitely a handful of YouTubers I trust with a review of a 3d printing product, who have public review policies and take principled approaches. At least two of these are pillars of the community and it’s a huge boon to the company to even have a review from that reviewer, even if it isn’t glowing.

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why isn’t it in YouTube’s best interest? They don’t care if the product gets praised or trashed, they aren’t selling it, you watch the video/ ads and they’re happy

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Youtubers need content. That means advanced releases of new electronics. You can’t get that unless every ‘review’ is positive.

          Fuck Unbox Therapy and Lewis Hilsenteger he started the enshitification of YouTube.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some people are still pretending. I try not to watch too much “sponsored content” so they don’t work on me.

      One of the last times I watched a sponsored video, I went and bought V Rising immediately after.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem is they make a really good printer at a really good price… But with them locking down their printers, I won’t be buying another.

      • Sunkblake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are really good machines for the price, and i will hold of the lock down update to the best of my ability. Next one ill probably build a voron or something that can print with high temperature.

    • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t like them either but I am strongly considering getting one because all the reports that it consistently works out of the box without any kind of mods as I need to just send prints to it and get a good print out without any fiddling about every time

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think they have a reputation more than reality that came about because everyone was upgrading from $150 Ender 3’s so in comparison it was incredible.

        The 3d printing nerd shown at the top couldn’t get petg to print out of the box.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        These days this is true of many other brands as well. The early days of your printer showing up as a kit full of bits and requiring you to spend as much time wrenching on it as using it are gone, unless you deliberately go and seek something like that out.

        Qidi, Anycubic, Prusa, Creatality, and probably tons of others I can’t think of off the top of my head also make machines that are unbox-and-use.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The Qidi Q2 has built-in spaghetti detection (and print failure detection in general), auto leveling, bed mesh compensation, etc. It’s not a print farm machine, though, so how you’ll get your parts off the bed and into your finished bucket will require some outboard tools and elbow grease. If its mechanicals are anything like my prior X-Max 3 from them I don’t predict it will require any adjustment, maintenance, or parts replacement for many hundreds/thousands of hours of runtime. I guess eventually you’ll need a nozzle at minimum, and you might want to lubricate the linear guides on the gantries every now and again.

            It’s also compatible with their “Qidi box” filament changer doohickey if that sort of thing is important to you.

    • swagmoney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      i heard people have had good luck with them. i, however, had terrible luck with a p1s. mine had a factory defect and in troubleshooting and replacing parts i came to find that the design and build quality wasn’t that good. i wouldn’t buy another one because of the experience i had working on it. and on top of that customer support was inconsistent, i had to frequently repeat myself because they wouldn’t read back in our correspondence, they contradicted themselves and it took over a year for them to honour the warranty. sold that pos and replaced it with a prusa 😎

  • fluxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tom Sanladerer pointed some disqualifying flaws at least. Not just praise. But still - as far as I’m considered - no Tux, no Bux. I’d rather buy an inferior or more expensive printer that I can thinker with for as long as I own it, rather than relying on faith to not get locked out of my own printer.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I did enjoy watching him drill a big hole in the back of the filter chamber and add another fan to actually draw the air though it. But yeah, at least Sanlanderer pointed out those poor to bad design choices in the machine.

      My biggest disappointment was in seeing the XY gantry being all glued together making it irreparable. It’s a good thing I’m not in someone that would buy this printer anyway.

      • fluxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, you make a good point. Even the hardware is locked-down. Not something I would buy at this point. Perhaps as my first printer, but then, it’s not cheap exactly.