Bazzite supports consoles, but is far from only targeting consoles. There’s also Aurora which is like Bazzite but without the gaming stuff. Same benefits: background updates, easy rollbacks, and lots of included tools that are just useful (podman, brew, distrobox, etc).

But if you have personal reasons against Fedora then it’s important to be aware that Bazzite and Aurora are both based off Fedora

Since you liked Fedora but not GNOME, sounds like Bazzite or Fedora KDE could have worked out well too. Just something to consider if you want something more stable and less cutting edge

Well I’m not trying to start a community around helping people, I’m just a participator. If I wanted to maximize the number of people I could help, I might move back to reddit

edit: a word

Those saying “just self-host Matrix/Stoat/XMPP”, do not understand the power of network effects. If people are too lazy to sign up on your custom server, and you end up with 50% of the users you would have gotten if you used Discord, is that worth it? What if it was only 10%?

I wish there were a solution to this. Interoperability sounds nice until you have multiple competing standards (like Matrix and XMPP)

You’re not wrong but when you use somebody else’s config you use somebody else’s…configuration. Like if they use ProtonVPN, you’ll need to use ProtonVPN as well. If they use Usenet instead of torrents, that’s what you’ll get as well. If somebody uses Podman instead of Docker, etc etc. So this is why it can be more difficult than just ripping configs from strangers.

This is the classic problem where the more flexibility a program has, the more fragmentation comes out of it. The *arr stack is complicated for this reason. It’s a million different pieces that can be configured in a million different ways. Something like Nextcloud is much more plug-and-play. I’ve been doing self-hosting for years now and even I find *arr a chore to deal with.

Though nothing wrong with referencing other people’s configs to get a sense of what it’s supposed to look like. Start simple, look for somebody who has a radarr + qbittorrent + gluetun stack working, and go from there.

Depending on the number of devices you have, your threat model, it can be helpful to set up a security hierarchy. So you only need to worry about securing the devices at the top of the hierarchy, and can play loose and careless with the devices lower down. That way it’s less likely to lose everything due to one mistake

Even if you have a password for your ssh key, malware on your system can just wait until you enter the password.

My point is that SSH access is very powerful, and effectively means that the security of the SSH server is reduced to the security of the SSH client. If your SSH client is pwned, so is your server. If you have 10 devices each with ssh access to each other, then if any one device is pwned, all devices are pwned as well.

This is not the case for systems designed for file sharing only. For example with syncthing, if one device gets pwned, all it can do is send files to the other devices.

Most people probably don’t care but it can be a security risk, allowing malware to move “laterally” between all your devices. For my main devices I don’t give them SSH access to each other, but I do give them SSH access to my secondary devices (like a Pi-Hole)

Very cool, I’ll have to spin up some VMs and test it out myself. Thanks for all the info!

Wow cool! I believe you’re the first person I’ve met that actually used a cluster FS (in their homelab at least). I looked into it myself but it felt like nobody was really using it so I didn’t bother.

Does it involve much more work or is it a fairly transparent replacement to traditional storage options? Assuming one is already using Kubernetes. I’m wondering if it’s worth it to switch to a cluster FS for everything, like Radicale or Tiddlywiki.

Have you tried using Ceph or other distributed storage systems in your kubernetes cluster?

I’m aware of databases that support HA, but the vast majority of self-hosted apps I’ve encountered use file storage, even if they have a database as well. It sounds like you’re proposing shared storage like an NFS share. But if you’re upgrading nodes, at some point you have to upgrade the node hosting the shared storage right? Wouldn’t that take down all services? Unless you use a distributed storage system, but I’ve heard those can get very complicated…

have you found many self-hosted services that suppprt that kind of HA? I can’t imagine services like torrent clients allowing you to stream writes to one node while replicating to the other, though maybe I’m misunderstanding the setup

These comments are why privacy products will always be behind. Why open-source is full of dead projects. These people are just trying to make a living off making privacy-focused products. And all the comments are like “They’re a for-profit company? They had marketing material prepped to reply to people’s comments?!”.

The code is open-source, self-hostable, built using commodity hardware (raspi), and they’re just trying to make it sustainable by providing an optional paid service. This is not the enemy.