Check the rest of the thread 🤣

People in here don’t work in the space, and are clearly not knowledgeable about the subject. They can downvote me all they want.

Removed by mod

deleted by creator

Not trying to dump on your efforts or anything here, but you’d be better off first defining a scope of what you’re trying to do, and then work off an existing hardware or software platform.

You can get phone dev kits for cheaper than $200 if you just want to build something that works without Android, but if you intend to take that further and design some of the software experience, you’d be better off just working or contributing to something that already exists.

A single person can’t even begin to touch on the fundamentals of what it takes to run a phone experience in that that we currently understand and use them. Touch UX, software<>hardware integration, peripherals like cameras…it’s A LOT. Doing it well as a single developer is just not going to happen.

If your goal is simply to not have to buy another shit Google-infested phone, you can get a cheap that runs other things right now.

This should sidestep that and timeout pretty quickly: https://jshtab.github.io/guide/gvfs-autmount/

Try going into your BIOS settings and disabling IOMMU for the USB and Chipset settings. Boot and see if it works then.

Your North and South (if you have one )bridge chip?

No, not what I’m saying. Any distro can do what you’re describing, they just don’t. It’s not proprietary technology or anything. I could go and make my LUKS whatever open with a key right now, it’s just problematic.

The OP wasn’t asking about any of this though, you’re just throwing your own unrelated “AKSHUALLY” nonsense into the thread. Question was asked and answered.

See ya.

Open your machine and look at these ports.

Are they directly connected to the motherboard, or on the front of a case extended by a cable?

It’s not “trouble” if you’re already familiar with Linux. It’s not the way I would go as a user of 20+ years, but it’s not just for desktop use.

If you’re looking to build a platform for something, it’s perfect. Look at why Valve switched to use to for SteamOS. You have an underlying framework of a stable system, and you just create automation to slap it all together into the base layer of all the things you want without having to worry about specific things breaking the stack you’re building on top of it.

It’s like a blank page instead of a notebook with line guides.

It helps make more sense if you think of everything you’ve got to build on it already existing in a git repo. Merge > Build > Release. Makes perfect sense, and you save yourself creating an entire distro to maintain from scratch.

That’s not what the question is asking…

The “disk” in this terminology is actually referring to the partition, which is the active disk when an OS boots. Different partitions are treated as different disks, it’s not about the physical disk.

Say you have 2 drives: one could contain only unencrypted portions of boot information, and the second drive could only contain encrypted partitions.

Then it would meet your definition of how it should work by terminology 😂

That’s slightly different. That is mapping controllers to already existing inputs for a game, which steam-input already does.

Mapping all the sensors of a VR headset for motion and tracking is an entirely different thing, though kinda similar in some sense.

They’ve already said they’ll be using FEX: https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/vr-hardware/steamos-launching-for-arm-fex-translation-layer/

Desktop is a built-in feature of SteamOS. They’d have to actually work to remove that by default. No reason for it not to be there.

I’ll drop what I said about this in another thread:

I think you probably need to understand the underpinnings of what Valve accomplished over the past few years to understand why the Frame is useful.

Essentially, it’s a Deck strapped to your face. Same OS, same everything, just different hardware platform.

Valve spent the time to revamp SteamOS in order to make it more portable to various devices, which are now launching. Couple that with their efforts on Proton, and you have an entire ecosystem with very little in the way of preventing people from adopting these devices with their ease of use.

Steam Deck was just sort of the appetizer and test launch to gauge interest and build a fully functional hardware development and support vertical in the company, and it was wildly successful. I guarantee (if they can get the price right) that the Frame will sell WAY more units than the awful Vision Pro. I honestly think people might adopt this over buying another version of the Deck if it’s comfortable.

Some things I expect to happen with the Frame launch:

• A more expanded integration of Desktop features. If Valve doesn’t do it, the community will.
• Virtual screen management
• Theater mode for viewing media
• Virtualized VR input (like steam-input but VR)
• Pairing capabilities for multiplayer
• Half-Life 3 release (not joking)

TLDW: “Everyone ignore my personal and political positions on everything, I’m giving you free code…”

We don’t need another Reiser incident, shitbag.

Go fuck yourself, David.

This guy fucks…or plays games with controllers

This is incredibly confusing and formatted oddly, so let me get some clarification:

1. What protocol are you using to mount the NAS to the Ubuntu machine?
2. What did you use to transfer this slow file over the network? The disk transfer rate would be much faster than the network in any case, so 160MB/s may just be the network max.
3. Have you tried other files and methods to transfer, like SSH, Rsync…etc? Try those and post the speeds.

I think you might want to focus in a slightly different direction in that you want one with controls for power loss on AC that you can set. The physical button doesn’t matter the firmware does.

The Emporia ones I have do have firmware settings for that, but I have zero idea if ALL of them do. I think I got mine 3-4 years ago, so it may be different now with updated versions.