• Quittenbrot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Earlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.”

      What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The discrepancy between how the book and the media analyses the situation.

            • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Since it is you that keeps referring to this book on here, it is you who should be able to point to something precise that you find noteworthy.

              How come you’re not able to do that?

              • plyth@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                You haven’t asked for something noteworthy.

                But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America.

                That doesn’t have to be Russia.

                • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t think it will be Russia. What’s your point? Do you know the sentence that comes before this?

                  • plyth@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Yes. It’s strange even if the sentence before would be the goal. What does it say about the EU?