Plex is starting to enforce its new rules, which prevent users from remotely accessing a personal media server without a subscription fee.

If anyone needs it: https://jellyfin.org/

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    15 days ago

    Why would anyone use Plex over jellyfin anyway? The writing was on the wall years ago.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’m ready to replace plex but unless something major has changed in the last several months I simply can’t understand how people feel jellyfin is a comparable solution to plex. I couldn’t even get past the user interface and it falling flat on its face with media recognition.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Looks fine to me, I replaced plex like 3-4 months ago

        Jellyfin / jellyseer + arr

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Can I install/use jellyfin directly on my tv? That’s the only think keeping me on pkex (I haven’t tried jellyfin but I’m open to other options)

      • sucius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        I have a kinda old but still working great 4k TV that is not supported so I use a fire tv dongle. No complaints so far. The same for other family members who have Android tv and webos

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Jellyfin is notoriously full of security holes. It’s recommended to not expose it to the Internet. It’s also easy easier on Plex, at least until this bullshit, to have a random non-techie family member sign in to your Plex server from anywhere. I never liked Plex and never got into it, but I see why people used to prefer it.

      I think Emby is a good middle ground for people looking to jump ship from Plex. But I switched to jellyfin from my lifetime Emby sub because the plug-in community there feels dead and Emby development felt dead in the water.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          It has several unsecured endpoints.

          https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

          If you read the comments the devs know it’s a serious issue but don’t want to break backwards compatibility fixing them. Their solution for now is to warn people of the risks of exposing their instance to the Web. Which I don’t think they’re doing a great job of.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 days ago

            Aside from most of those being “potential issues”, which weren’t proven, the rest are GETs of things that do not need to be secret, things like album art and list of installed plugins. Besides the one plugin issue, which was an actual security issue, which was fixed over a year and a half ago. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/11436

            Contrast that with Plex which has numerous high severity CVEs that include things like remote code execution, directory traversal, and more.

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              14 days ago

              list of installed plugins.

              Yeah, as you said, that’s a pretty serious security issue. That’s a data leak that explicitly lays out the shape of your attack surface. It tells the attacker exactly what additional software your server is running and if any of it includes known vulnerabilities, the attacker now knows how to gain access.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                That only works if the plugins are somehow accessible through an api controller, which as far as I’m aware, is not how jellyfin plugins work. So no, it wouldn’t increase your attack surface at all.

            • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              You’re aware those CVEs are only relevant for ancient versions of Plex and were fixed long ago?

                • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 days ago

                  CVEs don’t get issued “resolved” statuses… They are either reserved, published, or rejected (technically NVD have a few extra for published). That’s just junk data in that tool you’re using. Use authoritative sources like cve.org or nvd.nist.gov.

                  You can see the CPEs on NVD and they’re old versions of Plex (and were old when the vulns were published).

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              And you think if Jellyfin were a comparable size, there wouldn’t be just as many or more?

    • DancingTable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Skip intro on Apple TV not working on Jellyfin is probably the #1 reason I do not use it.

      When tvOS 26.2 comes out I will tentatively test Jellyfin + Infuse, but until then, Jellyfin is a non-starter for me.

      But I use Emby over Plex so still not using Plex.

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Using jellyfin on Chromecast. For the past 3 weeks I’m stuck not being able to use it because some update broke subtitles support for external players. App became useless, I can’t downgrade it, and the bug is still not fixed.

      Not going to use Plex, just my 2 cents.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Setting up Jellyfin as a local media server is very simple. Setting it up with easy access for remote friends and family is a hassle.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Because its more polished, has more platforms for clients to run on, and can be remotely shared with a simple account login and no configuration required. To name a few.

  • ftbd@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Imagine hosting a software on your own hardware and still choosing the one that makes you dependent on the whims of a corporation lmao

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      When I first set up my server this year it was a VERY easy decision between this and jellyfin. Why would I ever go with the corporate, closed source option?

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      *only for external streaming.

      You can cut it off from the internet and stream in your house locally for free still.

      End from any external streaming perspective, they are hosting a repository with your connection and port info, so your external friends can connect without you needing to manually configure or update their settings when you make a local change. Plus they are hosting stream relays for those that are unable to make a direct connection. To me, seems fair they’d ask for payment for that service.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Plex is not free. Plex is paid software, just like Google Photos or iCloud. The only free software is open source. Open source everything. Doesn’t matter if the client is open source. If the server isn’t, it’s not open source. (I’M LOOKING AT YOU, SNAP!)

  • littleomid@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    Am I the only one who thinks jellyfin is not only superior to pure, but also way more intuitive to setup? I still don’t understand how plexs routing works, and why I need a central account in order to connect to my own server.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Is it more intuitive to set up for remote streaming to friends…? That’s the use case here and as far as I know the answer is a big “no”.

      • discomatic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I got Jellyfin set up and available for streaming in less than two hours. Plex kept demanding that my friend buy a pass to download something, so I was like, nah. Jellyfin works flawlessly and is (in my opinion) a far superior option. I constantly had issues with Plex.

    • fluffy@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Probably not the only one, but configuring your server for outside access is way easier with Plex.

      Since I mainly use these services for streaming my music collection (long time cd collector), I declare that Plexamp is simply superior to jellyfin. It is really awesome and feature-rich and jellyfin does not even come close to Plexamp regarding music in my opinion.

    • Jeremyward@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Love jellyfin, super easy to install on my proxmox server. Its been running for nearly a year now, no problems. ❤️

    • tym@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      took all of 5 minutes to convert plex-on-pi to jellyfin-on-pi. Probably harder to rename the host than install… fstab’s already set up and errything

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    14 days ago

    Anybody still using Plex kind of deserves what they get at this point. They’ve been announcing these anti-consumer “features” for a while now.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      People don’t deserve to be mistreated but it is surprising that folks haven’t abandoned it if they’re so actively anti consumer.

      • sixty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Agree to disagree. When they actively and willingly go for the product that’s screwing them over.

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Do you think that applies to you as well? That you deserve bad things to happen to you because of your consumer choices?

    • De Lancre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Two years ago, when I found out that you need damn subscription, to watch YOUR stuff with transcoding on your device in local network, from your local server - I complained on reddit and a lot of people was disagree with me for harsh position.

      They_got_what they_focking_deserve.png

      • eah@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 days ago

        Pure rent seeking. It’s not the only example. So many products have artificial defects deliberately added by the manufacturer so that they can then charge you to disable the defect.

        • Buckshot@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          Years ago now, they pushed an offer for lifetime subscription onto my server. I clicked it, went through to their website and bought it, paid, the subscription activated and worked.

          The next day they emailed to say actually i wasn’t eligible for the offer, they cancelled it and refunded me and said it would actually cost $30 more.

          I installed Jellyfin that same day, it was pretty buggy back then but was definitely the right decision.

      • Zanathos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Welcoming the incoming dowvotes for correcting your comment just like the many similar comments and posts I’ve seen on Reddit, but this is purely a configuration issue.

        Transcoding on local network is allowed without a subscription. If you are running your own DNS server (like pihole or unbound) you need to configure an internal “plex.direct” record. You also need to uncheck an option to “treat your WAN IP as internal” option which corrects double NAT issues.

        I have yet to see a need to move away from Plex. I paid for the cheap lifetime sub over a decade ago at this point and everyone I invite to my server has no complaints and has not had to pay Plex a dime. I don’t use their plex.tv proxy, I direct connect to my own IP and leave their remote proxy option off in the server and everything works great.

        I will check out Jellyfin at some point if Plex makes things more difficult in time, but for now these articles are literally just rage bait in the homelab ecosystem. They enacted this back in April of 2025 already!

        • kalpol@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          I never checked to see what was actually in the logs but when i was running Plex, it constantly tried to send a lot of log data to its masters. That alone was enough to budge me up and get Jellyfin. Jellyfin isn’t as polished but it works perfectly fine for me.

      • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Lies. Local streaming never required a plex pass. Its for remote streaming only, but keep pushing that false narrative.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      I kind of understand why someone would honestly. Jellyfin subtitles are still a hot mess for a lot of formats unfortunately. Also, while plex has tried really hard to ruin their UI, I’ve still had more trouble explaining where to find things in Jellyfin. And if you’re sharing your collection with friends or family members there’s a lot more technical stuff involved.

      So I can see why the balance might still tip toward paying plex still for some people.

      Luckily I bought a lifetime license ages ago before the first price hike so this doesn’t affect me yet. So I’m just riding out the decline, running them in parallel until plex completely breaks. slowly transitioning the family as they get annoyed with broken features. Plexamp is quickly taking care of that 😅

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    Jellyfin users, how is the transcoding situation? I have a mix of AV1 and H265 and I need to get smooth playback to my living room Apple TV for families’ sake.

    • Drun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      If you’re ok with Plex, then you’ll be ok with Jellyfin

      And we also have metadata manager, so you don’t have to rename your TV show files every time!

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    Lol, guess who just made themselves a target. They are now profiting directly on people who stream content they don’t own from other people’s servers. Plex is going to go down when Hollywood sues them.

    • nixon@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 days ago

      I believe if the server hosting the content has a plex pass then end users are allowed to stream from it without any additional subscription or membership. At least that is how it was several months ago when they announced this.

      But you are right, even with the above being true, there will still be a non-insignificant portion of users paying to stream from servers.

  • Stillwater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    I ultimately want to ditch Plex, but as an existing lifetime member, it currently handles everything so smoothly for my users that I don’t see enough benefits in switching. Particularly on the music streaming side (PlexAmp), I think the experience is the most polished one I’ve seen.

    My hope is that by the time the lifetime Plex Pass experience has become enshittified, Jellyfin will be more ready than it is today, and I’ll make a switch then.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I ran Jellyfin and plex for a while, using Jellyfin instead of plex at every oppurtunity. Then Jellyfin broke, I couldn’t figure out how to fix it in an evening, and I just went back to using Plex, which had continued working. It isn’t great, sure, but it’s fine. I think Jellyfin would need to be Immich levels of cool, or plex would actually need to be unusable for me to switch.

      • tobz619@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m in the same boat, I have a Plex pass, I have my reverse proxy setup, Plex just works ™ and when it stops, Jellyfin is already installed and ready to go.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    I never shared my server anyway, but a lot of the other design decisions they’ve made over the last couple years drove me to Jellyfin. My issue though is I cannot figure out how to set it up properly like I had Plex setup with genres, sort by added to server, lists, etc. I can’t tell if I’m missing something obvious, or Jellyfin just lacks those features and I need to get a plugin or something. Anyway, sorry for the rant. Just hoping someone has experienced similar and might point me in the right direction.

    • kalpol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Don’t know all the answers but the home screen has the “Recently Added” rows if you scroll down.

      • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        And you can go to plex settings and disable all the love channels, discover, friend activity, etc that everyone complains about. Make it a simple plex server again.

    • JTode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      I display my movies and music in the order they were added by default, but I do recall a lot of historical problems with that functionality. It has not been a problem for me the last year or two, I would say, but I do remember it being a problem.

      There’s still lots of room for improvement, to be damn sure. But can’t beat the feeling of freedom, you ask me.

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m just thankful that the app doesn’t run like garbage due to all the bloat like Plex does. That and I really like the fact it auto checks for subtitle files and plays them. Overall I am glad I moved I just wish there were a couple more features.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    Years ago I decided to go with Emby over Plex only because at the time plex didnt support kodi integration and I enjoyed using that at the time for my front-end user experience. Within 6 months they started supporting it and I was upset since I did want to go with plex. Lately I feel like I made the perfect decision. It’s gotta be close to 10 years now and I paid one $100 lifetime fee for Emby and still use it everyday along with some family and friends I gave access to. Also gotta remember I dont believe jellyfin was even an option at that time. I tried it not to long ago and although it was fine, I actually think I liked emby a little more.

    As for the remote access, how do they block it? Do they not allow you to setup your own remote connection that does not involve plex? Thats how I do it, I do not use emby connect to make it easier to go through them I just setup my own domain, use ddns, and configure the ports I want exposed and thats it. If plex doesnt allow that then thats already crazy, if they do and even thats now blocked then thats even crazier.

    Emby may be simpler, and i heard about plex having a music AI feature that I was actually jealous of, but overall it just works and not paying anything in forever will always be my preferred method over awful monthly subscriptions anyday.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Plex centralizes authentication at plex.tv

      When a user wants to connect to a ‘private’ plex server, they must first sign into their plex.tv account, which then provides the auth token needed to login to the users server (even if both the client and server are on the same lan)

      With this system, Plex can monitor and control every single connection to every plex server; limiting access to whatever they want. Even your own local content.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Dam thats what I thought. Emby has something similar but doesnt force you to use it so I don’t.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Emby has what they call ‘Emby Connect’ which is entirely optional and is basically a glorified DNS service.

          It doesn’t proxy connections, it just passes on the hostname to the client. The server is still required to setup port forwarding or other routing like tailscale or a proxy on a vps.

          Emby Connect will let you sign into your local server using your emby.media credentials, but unlike Plex it’s completely optional and only works once explicitly linked to the local user of an Emby server.

      • kalpol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah hell to the naww. They’re also probably tracking all your viewing habits and monetizing that data, they’d be foolish not to with that kind of access.

    • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I bought the Emby lifetime license about 2 years ago when the plex remote streaming stuff first started getting talked about. It coincided with my server refresh so it ended up working out. I have been really happy with Emby so far.

      One thing to note is that music streaming on remote devices is WAY better on plex, Emby behaves more like a mapped network drive running over the internet to a local music player that then forgets your position on pause or when you move away from the remote app/device whereas Plex is actually functional as a modern music player. I keep a local copy of my music library on my phone anyways and okay through Gonemad so it is a non-issue for me but Emby should work better than it does in that case.

      Plex also allows/provides “live” tv (with ads) which can be nice if you are into that, and there is the “free” streaming library too which Emby doesn’t offer. I’ll keep plex around for those features but non-of my stuff is/will be hosted on Plex.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah, as a big music fan I have always been disappointed in Embys music functionality. I followed the discussions around this on there site and I was a bit disappointed by the response. They were getting the same feedback around how bad it is and it should be revamped or even have a dedicated app just for music and they just dismissed it basically saying we’ll it can be something we may do later on but dont hold your breath and that they believe it works fine the way it is and dont agree it will help.

        Luckily I really didnt care to use it for music anyway. I already had a Subsonic (now Navidrome) server for that. It would have been nice for a few things, but ultimately it was fine. The cool part is the android app Symfonium is the best music app I have ever used and it connects to all the servers to pull data. I obviously still use navidrome, but I could just pull from emby as well with it.

  • JTode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    (looks up from his floaty chair in his Jellyfin pool while sipping his fruity bittorrent cocktail) C’MON IN FOLKS THE WATER’S FINE!

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’ve never used jellyfin, but do they also host proxy servers? AFAIK plex does and its costing them money, hence the need for paywalling this. You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

      I used to use Plex and when I discovered there was paid remote streaming function - that goes through their servers - my reactions were “Haha, no”* and checking whether my existing WireGuard setup would do it instead.

      Whaddya know, remote streaming using Plex and PlexAmp at no cost.


      *Not because I begrudge them recouping costs, but because it’s designed that way to justify charging for it, gives them whatever information they want from my viewing, and it’s not self-hosting if there’s any third party cloud/account component to it.