skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 days agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up146arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days ago China is in a win-win-win situation Unless Russia crumbles and their belt and road initiative fails. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoAs you apparently regularly keep on referring to this book of Zbigniew Brzezinski, have you actually read it?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoNo, it’s already annoying to know the summary.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoI find it rather difficult to regularly use a book as an argument for something if you haven’t even read it.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThat is a good attitude. I obviously don’t see the need in this case. It’s not prose but facts. They can’t be significantly altered in the summary.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days ago I obviously don’t see the need in this case. You don’t think you’d benefit knowing what you regularly cite? It’s not prose but facts. What facts?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoFor the most part I reference the Wikipedia page. The quotes were on your request. The Wikipedia page describes the way the situation is conceptualized.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days ago I obviously don’t see the need in this case. It’s not prose but facts. Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
Unless Russia crumbles and their belt and road initiative fails.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
As you apparently regularly keep on referring to this book of Zbigniew Brzezinski, have you actually read it?
No, it’s already annoying to know the summary.
I find it rather difficult to regularly use a book as an argument for something if you haven’t even read it.
That is a good attitude. I obviously don’t see the need in this case. It’s not prose but facts. They can’t be significantly altered in the summary.
You don’t think you’d benefit knowing what you regularly cite?
What facts?
For the most part I reference the Wikipedia page. The quotes were on your request.
The Wikipedia page describes the way the situation is conceptualized.
Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
The concepts