skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 days agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up146arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoFor the most part I reference the Wikipedia page. The quotes were on your request. The Wikipedia page describes the way the situation is conceptualized.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days ago I obviously don’t see the need in this case. It’s not prose but facts. Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoIn the same way that the words you are reading right now are not imaginary.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoThere’s a difference between opinions and facts.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWhen the topic is ideas then ideas are facts.
For the most part I reference the Wikipedia page. The quotes were on your request.
The Wikipedia page describes the way the situation is conceptualized.
Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
The concepts
They are facts to you?
In the same way that the words you are reading right now are not imaginary.
There’s a difference between opinions and facts.
When the topic is ideas then ideas are facts.
Which topic?
The structure of the war.