skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 days agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up146arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAnd you think this book contains facts about ‘the structure of the war’?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThe book contains facts about how people think about the war.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAnd which of these facts do you want to point out by citing the book?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoNot one in particular but the overall approach.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoEarlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.” What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?
Which topic?
The structure of the war.
And you think this book contains facts about ‘the structure of the war’?
The book contains facts about how people think about the war.
And which of these facts do you want to point out by citing the book?
Not one in particular but the overall approach.
Namely?
That it’s very functional.
Earlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.”
What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?