skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 5 days agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoNot one in particular but the overall approach.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoEarlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.” What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThe discrepancy between how the book and the media analyses the situation.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoSince it is you that keeps referring to this book on here, it is you who should be able to point to something precise that you find noteworthy. How come you’re not able to do that?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYou haven’t asked for something noteworthy. But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America. That doesn’t have to be Russia.
Not one in particular but the overall approach.
Namely?
That it’s very functional.
Earlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.”
What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?
The discrepancy between how the book and the media analyses the situation.
What exactly?
Read the page and you will know.
Since it is you that keeps referring to this book on here, it is you who should be able to point to something precise that you find noteworthy.
How come you’re not able to do that?
You haven’t asked for something noteworthy.
That doesn’t have to be Russia.