How did you partition your disk before installing Linux? Do you regret how you set it up?

I’m looking for some real users experiences about this and I’m trying to find the best approach for my setup.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Raptorox@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    • 550MiB /boot (also used as esp)
    • Rest for / (btrfs)
    • Subvols for /home, /var/log, /var/cache, /.snapshots (snapper snaps), /swap
  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Defaults are usually fine for most users. People who know they are going to distro hop or need to move data later should have a separate /home, but that’s about it until you get into special purpose installs.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Just recently repartitioned my MacBook:

    1 GB for EFI (vfat)

    2 GB for /boot (ext4)

    11 GB for swap

    224 GB for / (bcachefs)

    Grub cannot load a kernel off bcachefs so I need ext4 to bridge the gap. Once the kernel is loaded, it has no problem using bcachefs as root.

    This is a laptop. On a desktop that can handle more drives, I would split /home onto a drive of its own.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two separate EFI boot Partitions if you dual boot. Its not worth letting Windows know about linux. Linux chainloads to Windows boot.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    save 80gb for root, sone swap (if not on an ssd) rest for /home. that way reinstalling or switching has minimal risk of losing my /home

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    For Laptops:

    • 500 MB - /boot/efi
    • 1 GB /boot ext2
    • X GB for / with Luks2 encrypted f2fs

    And don’t forget: GPT not MBR.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    ½TB nvme SSD for the OS and any system/user level binary

    1TB sata SSD for code projects, docker, and videogames

    10tb HDD for just having a massive amount of fairly stable storage space. I gotta tell you I sleep really well knowing that at 4 in the morning a compressed disk image of my work SSD is being written to the hard drive.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I partitioned my disk 50/50 for Windows and Linux with some proprietary software. It didn’t end up working and i whiped my windows install.

    Then I bought a new boot drive so my linux and macos install are physically separated.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Partitioning is one of those obsolete Unixisms that is best left in the 90s. Only exception is dual booting, but even there partitioning isn’t really very important anymore

  • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are you going to dual boot? Do you have some other special requirement? If not, there’s no reason to overthink partitioning in my opinion. I did this for my main NVME:

    • Partition table: GPT
    • /boot : 1GB fat32 partition. Depending on your needs (number of kernels, initramfs’s, other OSs) you might be fine with 500MB or even less. But because resizing can be a pain and I have the space to spare, I would much rather overprovision.
    • / : LUKS2 partition containing a btrfs filesystem with all the remaining space

    I use a swap file so I don’t use a swap partition. If you want more control over specific parts of the filesystem, eg a separate /home that you can snapshot or keep when reinstalling the system, then use btrfs subvolumes. This gives you a lot of the features a partition would give you without committing to a specific size.

    This is the only partitioning scheme I have never regretted. When I’ve tried to do separate partitions I find myself always regretting the sizes I’ve allocated. On the other hand, I have not actually seen any benefit of the separation in practice.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      not actually seen any benefit of the separation in practice.

      The first time some big download hoses your root, you will be enlightened :-D

      • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right, so this is exactly the sort of “benefit” I never expect to see. This is not something that has happened to me in ~25 years of computer use, and if it does happen there are better ways to deal with it. Btrfs and zfs have quotas for this, but even if they didn’t it would not be worth the tradeoff for me. Mispredicting the partition sizes I’ll end up needing after years of use is both more likely to happen and more tedious to fix.

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I have 1/3 of a 1 TB SSD for Windows, Linux and a free partition for random stuff each. With home finally on a second 2 TB SSD. This is great, so far.